Ideally, the workshop serves as a forum
for discussion of new methods, a classroom for teaching “how to” tasks, a medium for testing
new theories or concepts, a stage for advancing new thinking, and a vehicle
for staff within a library to share information and experiences. The
best workshops bring a little of all of that to bear against a topic
of some relevance. Then, mix in a comfortable environment that invites
participation and which is far enough from the “structure” of
the Library for really new or different ideas to get a fair hearing.
Workshops can be fun, entertaining, informative and build shared experiences
which culminate in the development or reinforcement of values among the
group. Or, they can be boring, dreary, mundane, irritating, a waste of
time and of no educational or redeeming social value. In other words:
obscene.
Getting a good workshop is a goal of both administrators and staff, but
sometimes it seems there is a divergence of focus. Administrators seem
to concentrate on content while staff seem to be concerned with entertainment
value or delivery. As with most things in life, a balance is important.
To the greatest extent possible, content selection should be a result
of staff meetings, strategic plan goals and/or discussions where staff
and administration agree on skills needed. For example, at a weekly staff
meeting which occurs after annual reviews are provided, one library did
a feedback session on the evaluation system. Turns out, no one liked
it and agreement was reached on a fix to the system. Workshops were scheduled
with a consultant to provide alternative ideas and a recommended enhancement
to the evaluation system that was fair, manageable, allowed for growth
and held people accountable. Multiple workshops were held to cover different
elements of the subject and most staff were both interested and felt
they were part of a significant process that both requested their input
and provided a solution to the issue.
As staff and administration come up with ideas for workshops at staff
meetings, a list can be created and those issues reviewed and prioritized
to reflect organizational direction and/or interest on the part of the
administration and staff. Once everyone owns that list, interest in the
workshops themselves becomes more widespread. This leads to a rule:
- Content is not always negotiable (some training is required) but
the discussion regarding topics and input from the staff should be
incorporated
as part of the content selection process.
The outcome should never be
a mystery. Once topics are identified workshop providers must identify “deliverables” or
outcomes for the workshop in specific detail. These outcomes should
be part of the negotiation
between consultant and administration. And, as part of the evaluation,
those outcomes should be part of what administrators hold participants
and consultant accountable for at the end of the training.
- To paraphrase Peter Senge, start with a clear understanding of the
outcomes you will receive at the end of the workshop.
While some workshops are comprised of such an esoteric nature the audience
must sit and learn or absorb as if they were in junior high getting exposed
to the periodic table of elements for the first time, participation is
a huge part of the value in most successful workshops. While some presenters
may be effective without participation in the form of exercises, break-out
groups, etc., the audience has value to contribute and participation
is a way to allow the audience to partner in the learning/entertaining/
growth value of the exercise.
- Meaningful participation allows
the audience to “own” the
subject and contribute to it.
Consultant presenters can be entertaining or not...but the best ones
are able to capture an audience and use their presenting skills to bring
the topic alive, relevant and something the audience cares about. When
recruiting a consultant/speaker, make sure they can present in a compelling
fashion. It isn’t optional.
- The message any audience will hear in a workshop is the one they
are awake for.
In Japan, the older and more senior the staff person, the more they are
offered the opportunities to attend a school or workshop. In that country
education is a privilege. While we see education/training as fundamental
to our abilities to provide high levels of performance, too often workshops
are seen as drudgery and anything but a privilege.The culture of the
library that values training and education, serves it as a reward and
reinforces those who embrace training and development with more opportunities
for advancement are sending a clear message. Similarly, staff who are
not offered training are receiving a different but equally powerful message.
Treat training as a reward and opportunity and participants will treat
it the same way.
- Training is like handing someone a business card. Offer it selectively
with reverence, care and respect...and it will be received the same
way. Offer it casually to anybody without much thought or importance
attached...and, surprise, it will be treated the same way.
Finally, workshops are a key opportunity to build the culture of the
Library. Directors who provide workshops are providing an opportunity
to build relationships, establish value systems and reinforce beliefs,
best practice. Loyalty may be enhanced and esprit raised. Use workshops
wisely and with an understanding of both the direct (training) effect
and the indirect (culture building) effect as key outcomes. Your library
will benefit.
|